<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Favors Appellant in Customs Case Due to Insufficient Proof of Order Dispatch u/s 153(3.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66332</link>
    <description>Condonation of delay - if we were to accept the presumption created by section 153 (3) of the Act, the respondent revenue would have to discharge the initial burden that the order-in-appeal was sent through post, as claimed, at the proper and complete address of the appellant. In view of the gaps, we are inclined to lean in favour of the appellant, as any other view would be a leap of faith. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2022 15:58:46 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2022 15:58:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694738" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Favors Appellant in Customs Case Due to Insufficient Proof of Order Dispatch u/s 153(3.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66332</link>
      <description>Condonation of delay - if we were to accept the presumption created by section 153 (3) of the Act, the respondent revenue would have to discharge the initial burden that the order-in-appeal was sent through post, as claimed, at the proper and complete address of the appellant. In view of the gaps, we are inclined to lean in favour of the appellant, as any other view would be a leap of faith. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2022 15:58:46 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66332</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>