<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (11) TMI 530 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304886</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee, directing the capitalization of preoperative expenses allocated to fixed assets. The expenses were deemed capital in nature, aligning with legal precedents such as Food Specialties Limited and Lucas-TVS Limited (No.2). The proportionate allocation method used by the assessee was considered fair and reasonable, leading to the decision in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2022 15:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694727" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (11) TMI 530 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304886</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee, directing the capitalization of preoperative expenses allocated to fixed assets. The expenses were deemed capital in nature, aligning with legal precedents such as Food Specialties Limited and Lucas-TVS Limited (No.2). The proportionate allocation method used by the assessee was considered fair and reasonable, leading to the decision in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304886</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>