<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 131 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429707</link>
    <description>The case involved the reopening of assessment for the Assessment Year 2008-09 due to income escaping assessment via accommodation entries. The Assessing Officer disallowed unverifiable purchases, initially at 100% but reduced to 5% by the ld. CIT(A) based on industry norms. Both Revenue and Assessee appealed, resulting in the Tribunal increasing the disallowance to 6%. The Assessee&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2022 09:05:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694714" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 131 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429707</link>
      <description>The case involved the reopening of assessment for the Assessment Year 2008-09 due to income escaping assessment via accommodation entries. The Assessing Officer disallowed unverifiable purchases, initially at 100% but reduced to 5% by the ld. CIT(A) based on industry norms. Both Revenue and Assessee appealed, resulting in the Tribunal increasing the disallowance to 6%. The Assessee&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429707</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>