<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 125 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429701</link>
    <description>The Tribunal consistently ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting additions made by the assessing officer regarding Fee for Technical Services/Fee for Included Services and royalty payments. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on its consistent approach in previous assessment years, resulting in the partial allowance of the appeal challenging the final assessment order for the assessment year 2018-19.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2022 08:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694708" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 125 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429701</link>
      <description>The Tribunal consistently ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting additions made by the assessing officer regarding Fee for Technical Services/Fee for Included Services and royalty payments. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on its consistent approach in previous assessment years, resulting in the partial allowance of the appeal challenging the final assessment order for the assessment year 2018-19.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429701</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>