<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 121 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429697</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) due to the lack of specific charges, proper satisfaction by the Assessing Officer, and merit-based considerations. The tribunal emphasized the necessity of clarity in initiating penalty proceedings and thoroughly evaluating all aspects of the case before imposing penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2022 09:05:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694704" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 121 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429697</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) due to the lack of specific charges, proper satisfaction by the Assessing Officer, and merit-based considerations. The tribunal emphasized the necessity of clarity in initiating penalty proceedings and thoroughly evaluating all aspects of the case before imposing penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429697</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>