https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429685 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that FRP rods should be classified under CTH 70022090 and are not liable for Anti Dumping Duty under Notification No 30/2011- CUS (ADD). The Tribunal's analysis found that the FRP rods, distinct from raw glass fiber, fell under CTH 70022090, excluding them from the duty applicable to goods under CTH 70199090. This decision provided clarity on the correct Tariff classification and duty implications, resulting in a fair resolution for the appellant. en-us Tue, 01 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Nov 2022 09:04:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429685 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that FRP rods should be classified under CTH 70022090 and are not liable for Anti Dumping Duty under Notification No 30/2011- CUS (ADD). The Tribunal's analysis found that the FRP rods, distinct from raw glass fiber, fell under CTH 70022090, excluding them from the duty applicable to goods under CTH 70199090. This decision provided clarity on the correct Tariff classification and duty implications, resulting in a fair resolution for the appellant. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 01 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429685