<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 103 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429679</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras dismissed the petitions seeking quashment of prosecution and challenging dismissal orders in discharge petitions. The court upheld the prosecution under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act against the petitioners, emphasizing the need to determine the source of funds for assets allegedly acquired from proceeds of crime during trial. The court allowed the petitioners&#039; absence during trial under specified conditions to ensure their participation and adherence to legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2022 09:04:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694686" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 103 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429679</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras dismissed the petitions seeking quashment of prosecution and challenging dismissal orders in discharge petitions. The court upheld the prosecution under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act against the petitioners, emphasizing the need to determine the source of funds for assets allegedly acquired from proceeds of crime during trial. The court allowed the petitioners&#039; absence during trial under specified conditions to ensure their participation and adherence to legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429679</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>