<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 96 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429672</link>
    <description>A sanctioned refund could not be appropriated against an interest demand that had already been settled under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019. Once the Department had issued SVLDRS-4 confirming full and final settlement, the underlying liability stood extinguished and no subsisting Government dues remained available for adjustment. The earlier appropriation therefore lacked legal foundation, and the assessee was entitled to release of the refunded amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2022 09:04:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694679" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 96 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429672</link>
      <description>A sanctioned refund could not be appropriated against an interest demand that had already been settled under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019. Once the Department had issued SVLDRS-4 confirming full and final settlement, the underlying liability stood extinguished and no subsisting Government dues remained available for adjustment. The earlier appropriation therefore lacked legal foundation, and the assessee was entitled to release of the refunded amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429672</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>