https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429666 The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, ruling that the patient's death following a kidney transplant was not a result of medical negligence. The Court found that the treating doctors provided adequate care, monitored the patient appropriately, and followed medical protocols. The Court emphasized that medical professionals should not be held responsible for outcomes beyond their control when they have acted with reasonable skill and competence. The appeal was dismissed, affirming that the unfortunate death was due to the patient's medical condition rather than negligence. en-us Wed, 20 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Nov 2022 09:03:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429666 The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, ruling that the patient's death following a kidney transplant was not a result of medical negligence. The Court found that the treating doctors provided adequate care, monitored the patient appropriately, and followed medical protocols. The Court emphasized that medical professionals should not be held responsible for outcomes beyond their control when they have acted with reasonable skill and competence. The appeal was dismissed, affirming that the unfortunate death was due to the patient's medical condition rather than negligence. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 20 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429666