https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429666 Post-operative medical negligence is not established by later complications or a fatal outcome after a successful kidney transplant; liability requires proof that the treatment fell below the standard of a reasonably competent professional, with breach of duty and lack of reasonable skill or competence. The Court found that the patient had been managed by qualified nephrologists and surgeons, kept under ICU monitoring, and discharged only after medical assessment, while the appellants' witnesses were not transplant specialists. On that evidentiary basis, the claim of deficient follow-up care failed and no liability was made out. en-us Wed, 20 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Nov 2022 09:03:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429666 Post-operative medical negligence is not established by later complications or a fatal outcome after a successful kidney transplant; liability requires proof that the treatment fell below the standard of a reasonably competent professional, with breach of duty and lack of reasonable skill or competence. The Court found that the patient had been managed by qualified nephrologists and surgeons, kept under ICU monitoring, and discharged only after medical assessment, while the appellants' witnesses were not transplant specialists. On that evidentiary basis, the claim of deficient follow-up care failed and no liability was made out. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 20 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429666