<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 83 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429659</link>
    <description>HC dismissed writ appeal filed by logistics service provider challenging GST-related seizure order. Despite initial vehicle and goods detention, the court found the appeal academic since goods were subsequently released. ITAT&#039;s broad judicial powers were recognized, allowing incidental stay orders. Appeal was dismissed without costs, with parties directed to pursue remaining issues before Appellate Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 10:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694636" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 83 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429659</link>
      <description>HC dismissed writ appeal filed by logistics service provider challenging GST-related seizure order. Despite initial vehicle and goods detention, the court found the appeal academic since goods were subsequently released. ITAT&#039;s broad judicial powers were recognized, allowing incidental stay orders. Appeal was dismissed without costs, with parties directed to pursue remaining issues before Appellate Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429659</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>