<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 78 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429654</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition made by the AO. The Tribunal found that the cash deposits were explained by the cash balance available as per the books of account, emphasizing the lack of evidence against the assessee&#039;s explanation. Additionally, the Tribunal noted the Department&#039;s failure to take adequate steps to retrieve necessary information during the search.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2022 09:12:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694628" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 78 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429654</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition made by the AO. The Tribunal found that the cash deposits were explained by the cash balance available as per the books of account, emphasizing the lack of evidence against the assessee&#039;s explanation. Additionally, the Tribunal noted the Department&#039;s failure to take adequate steps to retrieve necessary information during the search.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429654</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>