<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 76 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429652</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the order under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, allowing the appeal of the assessee. The corrections made in the assessment proceedings regarding long term capital gain were found to be factually correct and compliant with the law, without prejudicing the revenue&#039;s interest. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of verifiable facts and compliance in such corrections, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2022 09:12:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694625" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 76 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429652</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the order under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, allowing the appeal of the assessee. The corrections made in the assessment proceedings regarding long term capital gain were found to be factually correct and compliant with the law, without prejudicing the revenue&#039;s interest. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of verifiable facts and compliance in such corrections, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429652</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>