<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 64 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429640</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the reopening of the assessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act after four years was invalid as there was no failure on the part of the assessee to disclose all material facts. The Tribunal emphasized that the duty of the assessee is to disclose fully and truly all primary relevant facts, and the mere verification of records does not warrant reopening. Citing precedents, the Tribunal quashed the AO&#039;s order and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 May 2023 14:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694608" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 64 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429640</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the reopening of the assessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act after four years was invalid as there was no failure on the part of the assessee to disclose all material facts. The Tribunal emphasized that the duty of the assessee is to disclose fully and truly all primary relevant facts, and the mere verification of records does not warrant reopening. Citing precedents, the Tribunal quashed the AO&#039;s order and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429640</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>