https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429628 The High Court upheld the immediate possession of attached properties under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, allowing the Director or authorized officers to take action before the appeal period's completion. It emphasized that the attachment confirmation order is immediately executable, rejecting the argument that exceptional circumstances were required for action under Section 8(4) of the Act. The Court dismissed the appeals challenging eviction notices, stating that the remedy of appeal should be pursued rather than bypassed through writ jurisdiction. en-us Thu, 20 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Nov 2022 15:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429628 The High Court upheld the immediate possession of attached properties under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, allowing the Director or authorized officers to take action before the appeal period's completion. It emphasized that the attachment confirmation order is immediately executable, rejecting the argument that exceptional circumstances were required for action under Section 8(4) of the Act. The Court dismissed the appeals challenging eviction notices, stating that the remedy of appeal should be pursued rather than bypassed through writ jurisdiction. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 20 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429628