<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Responding to Initial Summons Doesn&#039;t Exempt Petitioner from Future Compliance or Appearance as Required by Authorities.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66304</link>
    <description>Validity of summons - Mere fact that the reply has been filed and the requisite documents as required in first summons have been furnished, does not absolve the petitioner of his statutory obligation to honour the summons. Nor does it take away right of the authorised officer to call upon the petitioner to appear before him - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2022 09:11:38 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2022 09:11:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694588" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Responding to Initial Summons Doesn&#039;t Exempt Petitioner from Future Compliance or Appearance as Required by Authorities.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66304</link>
      <description>Validity of summons - Mere fact that the reply has been filed and the requisite documents as required in first summons have been furnished, does not absolve the petitioner of his statutory obligation to honour the summons. Nor does it take away right of the authorised officer to call upon the petitioner to appear before him - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2022 09:11:38 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66304</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>