https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429625 Detention of a person at the airport and continued restraint before preparation of the arrest memo and production before the remand court were treated as relevant to compliance with Article 22 of the Constitution, which requires production before the nearest magistrate within twenty-four hours of arrest, excluding journey time. Continued custody beyond the constitutionally permitted period without judicial authorisation was treated as unlawful and supported grant of bail under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The court also noted that the complaint had already been filed, the matter was before the trial court, and trial was likely to take time. Bail was granted subject to conditions. en-us Wed, 21 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Nov 2022 09:11:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429625 Detention of a person at the airport and continued restraint before preparation of the arrest memo and production before the remand court were treated as relevant to compliance with Article 22 of the Constitution, which requires production before the nearest magistrate within twenty-four hours of arrest, excluding journey time. Continued custody beyond the constitutionally permitted period without judicial authorisation was treated as unlawful and supported grant of bail under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The court also noted that the complaint had already been filed, the matter was before the trial court, and trial was likely to take time. Bail was granted subject to conditions. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 21 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429625