https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304870 The appeal was admitted for adjudication after the delay of 61 days was condoned due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Tribunal found the order passed by CIT(E) invalid as it lacked a Document Identification Number (DIN) and did not comply with CBDT Circular No. 19/2019. Consequently, the appeal was decided in favor of the assessee based on the invalidity of the order, without delving into the merits of the case. The decision was pronounced on 18th July 2022. en-us Mon, 18 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Nov 2022 20:49:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304870 The appeal was admitted for adjudication after the delay of 61 days was condoned due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Tribunal found the order passed by CIT(E) invalid as it lacked a Document Identification Number (DIN) and did not comply with CBDT Circular No. 19/2019. Consequently, the appeal was decided in favor of the assessee based on the invalidity of the order, without delving into the merits of the case. The decision was pronounced on 18th July 2022. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 18 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304870