<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 1290 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304867</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi AT considered whether freight and logistics support receipts, reimbursement of GAM charges, and lease line reimbursements were taxable as fee for technical services or royalty. Following its own earlier orders on identical facts, it treated the freight, logistics support and GAM receipts as outside managerial, consultancy or technical services under section 9(1)(vii), and held the lease line reimbursement did not assume royalty character. It also applied the earlier treaty-based view that surcharge and education cess cannot be added over an all-inclusive treaty rate. The challenge to initiation of penalty proceedings was found premature.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2022 20:49:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694555" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 1290 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304867</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi AT considered whether freight and logistics support receipts, reimbursement of GAM charges, and lease line reimbursements were taxable as fee for technical services or royalty. Following its own earlier orders on identical facts, it treated the freight, logistics support and GAM receipts as outside managerial, consultancy or technical services under section 9(1)(vii), and held the lease line reimbursement did not assume royalty character. It also applied the earlier treaty-based view that surcharge and education cess cannot be added over an all-inclusive treaty rate. The challenge to initiation of penalty proceedings was found premature.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304867</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>