https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304859 Where execution or alteration of a promissory note is specifically disputed, the court should ordinarily permit handwriting or chemical examination if it may assist in reaching the truth. Expert opinion was treated as a relevant aid, and there was no legal bar to comparing handwriting, ink, or alleged alterations in the note. The refusal to refer the document for expert scrutiny was therefore unsustainable because it could deny the affected party a fair opportunity to rebut the presumption arising from a negotiable instrument. The suit promissory note had to be referred to a handwriting expert, and the revision was allowed. en-us Wed, 15 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Dec 2023 13:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304859 Where execution or alteration of a promissory note is specifically disputed, the court should ordinarily permit handwriting or chemical examination if it may assist in reaching the truth. Expert opinion was treated as a relevant aid, and there was no legal bar to comparing handwriting, ink, or alleged alterations in the note. The refusal to refer the document for expert scrutiny was therefore unsustainable because it could deny the affected party a fair opportunity to rebut the presumption arising from a negotiable instrument. The suit promissory note had to be referred to a handwriting expert, and the revision was allowed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 15 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304859