<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 773 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304858</link>
    <description>The ITAT Bangalore remanded the case back to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication in accordance with the law, emphasizing the need to consider the relevant Notification from the CBDT that was previously furnished but not taken into account. The assessee was granted a reasonable opportunity to present their case, and the appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2022 17:49:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694545" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 773 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304858</link>
      <description>The ITAT Bangalore remanded the case back to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication in accordance with the law, emphasizing the need to consider the relevant Notification from the CBDT that was previously furnished but not taken into account. The assessee was granted a reasonable opportunity to present their case, and the appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304858</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>