https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304857 A handwriting expert opinion under Section 45 of the Evidence Act was found unnecessary where the disputed signatures were said to be of 1995, but the specimen signatures available for comparison were from 2004. The nine-year gap, along with the possibility of variation or disguise in later signatures, made expert comparison unlikely to yield a reliable conclusion. On that basis, the trial court's refusal to send the agreement of sale and receipt for expert examination was held to be justified and was upheld. en-us Tue, 31 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Nov 2022 17:48:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304857 A handwriting expert opinion under Section 45 of the Evidence Act was found unnecessary where the disputed signatures were said to be of 1995, but the specimen signatures available for comparison were from 2004. The nine-year gap, along with the possibility of variation or disguise in later signatures, made expert comparison unlikely to yield a reliable conclusion. On that basis, the trial court's refusal to send the agreement of sale and receipt for expert examination was held to be justified and was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 31 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304857