<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 32 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429608</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the payment received by the assessee under the Master Franchise Agreement was not taxable as royalty, FTS, or FIS under the India-USA DTAA. The assessing officer&#039;s addition to the assessee&#039;s income was deemed incorrect and was deleted, following a previous decision in the assessee&#039;s favor for the assessment year 2016-17.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2022 11:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694518" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 32 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429608</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the payment received by the assessee under the Master Franchise Agreement was not taxable as royalty, FTS, or FIS under the India-USA DTAA. The assessing officer&#039;s addition to the assessee&#039;s income was deemed incorrect and was deleted, following a previous decision in the assessee&#039;s favor for the assessment year 2016-17.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429608</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>