https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429604 The HC ruled on a GST dispute involving bank guarantee invocation under Section 129. The court directed the petitioner to deposit 20% of the disputed tax amount within two weeks to prevent bank guarantee forfeiture. Despite the Appellate Tribunal's non-constitution, the court mandated compliance with statutory deposit requirements, ensuring the petitioner's right to appeal while protecting the revenue's interests. en-us Wed, 12 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Apr 2025 10:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429604 The HC ruled on a GST dispute involving bank guarantee invocation under Section 129. The court directed the petitioner to deposit 20% of the disputed tax amount within two weeks to prevent bank guarantee forfeiture. Despite the Appellate Tribunal's non-constitution, the court mandated compliance with statutory deposit requirements, ensuring the petitioner's right to appeal while protecting the revenue's interests. Case-Laws GST Wed, 12 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429604