<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 27 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429603</link>
    <description>HC denied bail application for a Senior Advocate accused of cybercrime involving fraudulent GST registrations. The court found prima facie evidence linking the applicant to creating forged firms and passing fake input tax credit. Given potential risks of evidence tampering and absconding of co-accused, bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 11:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694511" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 27 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429603</link>
      <description>HC denied bail application for a Senior Advocate accused of cybercrime involving fraudulent GST registrations. The court found prima facie evidence linking the applicant to creating forged firms and passing fake input tax credit. Given potential risks of evidence tampering and absconding of co-accused, bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429603</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>