https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429599 The Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the decisions of the CIT(A) and ITAT. The delay in filing the appeal was not justified, and the reasons provided by the appellant were deemed unacceptable. The Court emphasized that reliance on assurances from the Assessing Officer did not warrant condonation of the delay. The appeal was rejected without costs, with the Court emphasizing legal precedents and the factual circumstances of the case. en-us Tue, 13 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Nov 2022 10:17:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429599 The Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the decisions of the CIT(A) and ITAT. The delay in filing the appeal was not justified, and the reasons provided by the appellant were deemed unacceptable. The Court emphasized that reliance on assurances from the Assessing Officer did not warrant condonation of the delay. The appeal was rejected without costs, with the Court emphasizing legal precedents and the factual circumstances of the case. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 13 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429599