<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 13 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429589</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the addition made under section 68 of the Income Tax Act regarding an unsecured loan received. The assessee successfully proved the genuineness of the transaction through various documents, despite the lender not being available for examination. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned, and the case was decided in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2022 12:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694497" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 13 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429589</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the addition made under section 68 of the Income Tax Act regarding an unsecured loan received. The assessee successfully proved the genuineness of the transaction through various documents, despite the lender not being available for examination. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned, and the case was decided in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429589</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>