<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 12 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429588</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, reversing the decisions of the lower authorities on all issues raised in the case. The ITAT found no evidence to support the alleged bogus purchases, deleted the addition of unsecured loans under Section 68 due to sufficient evidence provided by the assessee, upheld the disallowance of interest on loans reversed by the CIT (A), and directed a reduced disallowance of certain business expenditures.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2022 10:16:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694496" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 12 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429588</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, reversing the decisions of the lower authorities on all issues raised in the case. The ITAT found no evidence to support the alleged bogus purchases, deleted the addition of unsecured loans under Section 68 due to sufficient evidence provided by the assessee, upheld the disallowance of interest on loans reversed by the CIT (A), and directed a reduced disallowance of certain business expenditures.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429588</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>