<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 100 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30794</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (A)&#039;s decision, allowing the respondent-bank&#039;s appeal regarding the refund claim for excess Service Tax paid under &quot;Banking and Other Financial Services.&quot; The Tribunal relied on previous judgments to support the validity of the refund claim and refused to grant a stay on the Commissioner&#039;s order. Both parties agreed to postpone the refund claim&#039;s pursuit until the appeal&#039;s resolution, emphasizing the need for an early hearing. The decision emphasized the thorough examination of the issue and the importance of prompt resolution due to the substantial amount involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69448" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 100 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30794</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (A)&#039;s decision, allowing the respondent-bank&#039;s appeal regarding the refund claim for excess Service Tax paid under &quot;Banking and Other Financial Services.&quot; The Tribunal relied on previous judgments to support the validity of the refund claim and refused to grant a stay on the Commissioner&#039;s order. Both parties agreed to postpone the refund claim&#039;s pursuit until the appeal&#039;s resolution, emphasizing the need for an early hearing. The decision emphasized the thorough examination of the issue and the importance of prompt resolution due to the substantial amount involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30794</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>