<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 1129 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429571</link>
    <description>HC allowed petitioner&#039;s writ challenging GST refund rejection. Court found circulars and precedents supported ITC refund claim under Section 54(3)(ii) of CGST Act. Despite alternative appeal remedy, HC quashed rejection orders and directed respondents to reconsider refund within two months, emphasizing petitioner&#039;s entitlement to relief based on legal interpretations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2025 13:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694436" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 1129 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429571</link>
      <description>HC allowed petitioner&#039;s writ challenging GST refund rejection. Court found circulars and precedents supported ITC refund claim under Section 54(3)(ii) of CGST Act. Despite alternative appeal remedy, HC quashed rejection orders and directed respondents to reconsider refund within two months, emphasizing petitioner&#039;s entitlement to relief based on legal interpretations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429571</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>