<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 1126 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429568</link>
    <description>HC allowed petitioner&#039;s writ challenging refund application rejection. Court found the refund application was improperly deemed time-barred, considering the subsequent Notification dated 05.07.2022 which excluded the period from March 2020 to February 2022 from limitation calculations. The order rejecting the refund was set aside and remanded for fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2025 16:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694433" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 1126 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429568</link>
      <description>HC allowed petitioner&#039;s writ challenging refund application rejection. Court found the refund application was improperly deemed time-barred, considering the subsequent Notification dated 05.07.2022 which excluded the period from March 2020 to February 2022 from limitation calculations. The order rejecting the refund was set aside and remanded for fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429568</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>