<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 73 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30789</link>
    <description>The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, CHENNAI. The Tribunal ruled that recipients were not liable to pay interest under Section 75 of the Finance Act, 1994 on service tax paid for services received from abroad before 16-8-2002, as non-resident providers without offices in India were not subject to service tax. The impugned order was upheld, and the appeal was dismissed on 4-7-2008.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 07:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69443" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 73 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30789</link>
      <description>The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, CHENNAI. The Tribunal ruled that recipients were not liable to pay interest under Section 75 of the Finance Act, 1994 on service tax paid for services received from abroad before 16-8-2002, as non-resident providers without offices in India were not subject to service tax. The impugned order was upheld, and the appeal was dismissed on 4-7-2008.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30789</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>