<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 1092 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429534</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in ITA No. 548/Chny/2021 regarding the penalty on differential WDV amounts, as the penalty was deleted based on the unintentional nature of the error. However, the appeal in ITA No. 145/Chny/2021 filed by an individual against a penalty on the company was dismissed due to lack of maintainability, emphasizing the importance of intention and factual circumstances in determining penalties under the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2022 08:15:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694399" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 1092 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429534</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in ITA No. 548/Chny/2021 regarding the penalty on differential WDV amounts, as the penalty was deleted based on the unintentional nature of the error. However, the appeal in ITA No. 145/Chny/2021 filed by an individual against a penalty on the company was dismissed due to lack of maintainability, emphasizing the importance of intention and factual circumstances in determining penalties under the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429534</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>