<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 1087 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429529</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition challenging Clause 6 of Regulation 6 of Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2018, which limited the number of attempts for obtaining a Customs Broker License to six. The court held that the petitioner did not have a vested right to seven attempts under the previous regulations and found the reduction in attempts from seven to six not arbitrary. The court emphasized that the petitioner had not challenged the regulations earlier and filed the petition speculatively. The court upheld the validity of the regulation and confirmed the authority of the respondents to modify the rules for the licensing examination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2023 11:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694394" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 1087 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429529</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition challenging Clause 6 of Regulation 6 of Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2018, which limited the number of attempts for obtaining a Customs Broker License to six. The court held that the petitioner did not have a vested right to seven attempts under the previous regulations and found the reduction in attempts from seven to six not arbitrary. The court emphasized that the petitioner had not challenged the regulations earlier and filed the petition speculatively. The court upheld the validity of the regulation and confirmed the authority of the respondents to modify the rules for the licensing examination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429529</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>