<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 1079 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429521</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the department wrongly invoked the extended period of limitation as there was no mala fide intent by the appellants to evade service tax payment. The demands for the extended period were set aside, but demands for the normal period were confirmed. The appeals were allowed regarding demands for the extended period of show cause notices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2023 15:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694382" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 1079 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429521</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the department wrongly invoked the extended period of limitation as there was no mala fide intent by the appellants to evade service tax payment. The demands for the extended period were set aside, but demands for the normal period were confirmed. The appeals were allowed regarding demands for the extended period of show cause notices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429521</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>