<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 1068 - JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429510</link>
    <description>The court partially allowed the petition, quashing the interim compensation order due to lack of proper reasoning and directing the Magistrate to issue a new order. The proceedings on the complaint were to proceed, focusing only on the five valid cheques, with the court emphasizing the Magistrate&#039;s consideration of this aspect during the trial.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2022 08:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694366" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 1068 - JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429510</link>
      <description>The court partially allowed the petition, quashing the interim compensation order due to lack of proper reasoning and directing the Magistrate to issue a new order. The proceedings on the complaint were to proceed, focusing only on the five valid cheques, with the court emphasizing the Magistrate&#039;s consideration of this aspect during the trial.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429510</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>