https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30782 The appeal was filed against an Order-in-Revision enhancing penalties under Section 84 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Member (Judicial) found the issue to be identical to a previous case involving Rakesh Rao, where penalties were not enhanced due to compliance with an Amnesty Scheme. Consequently, the impugned order enhancing penalties was set aside, and the appellants were directed to deposit the penalties imposed under Sections 76 & 77 within two weeks from the date of the judgment. en-us Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Jan 2009 16:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30782 The appeal was filed against an Order-in-Revision enhancing penalties under Section 84 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Member (Judicial) found the issue to be identical to a previous case involving Rakesh Rao, where penalties were not enhanced due to compliance with an Amnesty Scheme. Consequently, the impugned order enhancing penalties was set aside, and the appellants were directed to deposit the penalties imposed under Sections 76 & 77 within two weeks from the date of the judgment. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30782