<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (2) TMI 595 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304827</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court&#039;s judgment and restoring the trial court&#039;s decree. It held the State of Maharashtra vicariously liable for the negligence of its employees, which led to the death of Chandrikabai. The appellants were awarded damages of Rs. 36,000, along with costs throughout.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2022 13:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694324" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (2) TMI 595 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304827</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court&#039;s judgment and restoring the trial court&#039;s decree. It held the State of Maharashtra vicariously liable for the negligence of its employees, which led to the death of Chandrikabai. The appellants were awarded damages of Rs. 36,000, along with costs throughout.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304827</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>