<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 1066 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429508</link>
    <description>HC allowed the petition challenging a tax authority&#039;s letter, quashing the impugned communication and directing fresh reconsideration of IGST refund claim within three months. The court emphasized proper evaluation of statutory provisions, circulars, and petitioner&#039;s submissions, remanding the matter for comprehensive reassessment without prejudging the merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2025 13:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694314" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 1066 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429508</link>
      <description>HC allowed the petition challenging a tax authority&#039;s letter, quashing the impugned communication and directing fresh reconsideration of IGST refund claim within three months. The court emphasized proper evaluation of statutory provisions, circulars, and petitioner&#039;s submissions, remanding the matter for comprehensive reassessment without prejudging the merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429508</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>