<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 1063 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429505</link>
    <description>HC granted partial relief in tax dispute, directing respondents to provide personal hearing to petitioner and prohibiting coercive recovery actions. Petition challenging KGST Act observations and interest levy was disposed with liberty to submit response within one month. Court emphasized procedural fairness by ensuring opportunity to present counterarguments before potential enforcement measures.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2025 15:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694311" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 1063 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429505</link>
      <description>HC granted partial relief in tax dispute, directing respondents to provide personal hearing to petitioner and prohibiting coercive recovery actions. Petition challenging KGST Act observations and interest levy was disposed with liberty to submit response within one month. Court emphasized procedural fairness by ensuring opportunity to present counterarguments before potential enforcement measures.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429505</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>