<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 1043 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429485</link>
    <description>The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing appeals for AY 2013-14 and 2014-15 due to COVID-19, admitting them for adjudication. Deferred revenue expenditure and other expenses were held to be pre-commencement and should be capitalized, not allowed as business expenditure. Project expenditure was allowed to be capitalized for AY 2013-14, with a fresh adjudication for AY 2014-15. The disallowance of bad debts for AY 2014-15 was upheld, considering the nature of the advances. The revenue&#039;s appeal for AY 2013-14 was partly allowed, while the appeals for AY 2014-15 were allowed for statistical purposes, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2022 09:19:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694291" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 1043 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429485</link>
      <description>The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing appeals for AY 2013-14 and 2014-15 due to COVID-19, admitting them for adjudication. Deferred revenue expenditure and other expenses were held to be pre-commencement and should be capitalized, not allowed as business expenditure. Project expenditure was allowed to be capitalized for AY 2013-14, with a fresh adjudication for AY 2014-15. The disallowance of bad debts for AY 2014-15 was upheld, considering the nature of the advances. The revenue&#039;s appeal for AY 2013-14 was partly allowed, while the appeals for AY 2014-15 were allowed for statistical purposes, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429485</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>