<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 1025 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429467</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the PCIT&#039;s order under Section 263 was unwarranted. The Assessing Officer had conducted a detailed enquiry, considered valuation reports, and the DVO&#039;s report. The Tribunal found the PCIT&#039;s intervention unjustified, emphasizing that a review under Section 263 should not amount to a change of opinion. The original assessment was upheld, and the PCIT&#039;s order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2022 09:18:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694273" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 1025 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429467</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the PCIT&#039;s order under Section 263 was unwarranted. The Assessing Officer had conducted a detailed enquiry, considered valuation reports, and the DVO&#039;s report. The Tribunal found the PCIT&#039;s intervention unjustified, emphasizing that a review under Section 263 should not amount to a change of opinion. The original assessment was upheld, and the PCIT&#039;s order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429467</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>