https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429463 The Court set aside the order of the Appellate Tribunal, ruling that Extra Clear Float Glass was liable for Anti-Dumping Duty. The Tribunal's decision was challenged by the industry, arguing adverse economic effects. A subsequent notification supported the inclusion of Extra Clear Float Glass in the product under consideration. The Department found the Tribunal's decision illogical and supported the imposition of Anti-Dumping Duty. The Court stayed the Tribunal's order, pending the final outcome of the case, affecting the clearance of Extra Clear Float Glass subject to Anti-Dumping Duty. en-us Wed, 07 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 29 Oct 2022 09:18:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429463 The Court set aside the order of the Appellate Tribunal, ruling that Extra Clear Float Glass was liable for Anti-Dumping Duty. The Tribunal's decision was challenged by the industry, arguing adverse economic effects. A subsequent notification supported the inclusion of Extra Clear Float Glass in the product under consideration. The Department found the Tribunal's decision illogical and supported the imposition of Anti-Dumping Duty. The Court stayed the Tribunal's order, pending the final outcome of the case, affecting the clearance of Extra Clear Float Glass subject to Anti-Dumping Duty. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 07 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429463