https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429451 CESTAT Chennai ruled in favor of appellant regarding CENVAT credit refund of Rs.2,93,427/- for business support services provided to foreign clients during July-September 2014. The appellant was initially directed to take re-credit instead of cash refund, but this became impractical after GST implementation. Following precedent from VEER-O-METALS case, the Tribunal held that when re-credit cannot be availed due to GST introduction, cash refund must be allowed. Appeal was allowed. en-us Thu, 27 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Jun 2025 13:04:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429451 CESTAT Chennai ruled in favor of appellant regarding CENVAT credit refund of Rs.2,93,427/- for business support services provided to foreign clients during July-September 2014. The appellant was initially directed to take re-credit instead of cash refund, but this became impractical after GST implementation. Following precedent from VEER-O-METALS case, the Tribunal held that when re-credit cannot be availed due to GST introduction, cash refund must be allowed. Appeal was allowed. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 27 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429451