<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Pr.CIT , V Kolkata Vs. SWATI BAJAJ – VERY RELEVANT AND VITAL SURVEILLANCE MEASURES OF STOCK EXCHANGES AND SEBI NOT BROUGHT TO NOTICE OF HIGH COURT LEADING TO WRONG CONCLUSION OF PRICE RIGGING AND MANIPULATION BY INVESTORS.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=10772</link>
    <description>Allegations of price rigging in penny stocks must be evaluated against stock exchanges&#039; and SEBI&#039;s surveillance framework-real-time on-line alerts, off-line analytics, circuit filters, margins, exposure limits, trade-to-trade settlement, graded and additional surveillance measures, rumour verification and position monitoring-which constrain ability of small investors to effectuate sustained artificial price movements; failure to place these measures before adjudicative forums risks erroneous inferential findings, even as the assessee retains the initial burden under Section 68 to prove genuineness.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2022 10:39:56 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2022 10:39:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694198" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Pr.CIT , V Kolkata Vs. SWATI BAJAJ – VERY RELEVANT AND VITAL SURVEILLANCE MEASURES OF STOCK EXCHANGES AND SEBI NOT BROUGHT TO NOTICE OF HIGH COURT LEADING TO WRONG CONCLUSION OF PRICE RIGGING AND MANIPULATION BY INVESTORS.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=10772</link>
      <description>Allegations of price rigging in penny stocks must be evaluated against stock exchanges&#039; and SEBI&#039;s surveillance framework-real-time on-line alerts, off-line analytics, circuit filters, margins, exposure limits, trade-to-trade settlement, graded and additional surveillance measures, rumour verification and position monitoring-which constrain ability of small investors to effectuate sustained artificial price movements; failure to place these measures before adjudicative forums risks erroneous inferential findings, even as the assessee retains the initial burden under Section 68 to prove genuineness.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2022 10:39:56 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=10772</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>