<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 999 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429441</link>
    <description>In this SC case involving tax and penalty under CGST Act Section 129(3), the court upheld the appellate authority&#039;s order setting aside tax demand. The goods were intercepted during transportation using pre-used tax invoices. The court found insufficient grounds for detention and emphasized that tax and penalty cannot be based on mere presumption. The writ petition was dismissed, allowing the department to pursue alternative legal remedies under Chapter 15 and Section 122.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2025 12:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694193" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 999 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429441</link>
      <description>In this SC case involving tax and penalty under CGST Act Section 129(3), the court upheld the appellate authority&#039;s order setting aside tax demand. The goods were intercepted during transportation using pre-used tax invoices. The court found insufficient grounds for detention and emphasized that tax and penalty cannot be based on mere presumption. The writ petition was dismissed, allowing the department to pursue alternative legal remedies under Chapter 15 and Section 122.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429441</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>