<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (6) TMI 197 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30765</link>
    <description>HC denied charitable trust&#039;s exemption under s.11(1A) because funds from property sale were not properly invested; part lay in a current account and part in fixed deposit. The Court held the current account balance may be treated as a proper investment pending clarification, since cheque details were unavailable. The matter was remanded to the tribunal to ascertain the cheque amounts and deposits and to reassess entitlement to exemption accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2025 16:27:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69419" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (6) TMI 197 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30765</link>
      <description>HC denied charitable trust&#039;s exemption under s.11(1A) because funds from property sale were not properly invested; part lay in a current account and part in fixed deposit. The Court held the current account balance may be treated as a proper investment pending clarification, since cheque details were unavailable. The matter was remanded to the tribunal to ascertain the cheque amounts and deposits and to reassess entitlement to exemption accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30765</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>