<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 995 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429437</link>
    <description>The Madras HC ruled on a case involving provisional attachment of a bank account under Section 83 of CGST Act. The court found the attachment order expired after one year from its original date, rendering the writ petition infructuous. Consequently, the petitioner was permitted to resume normal bank account operations without restrictions, and the case was disposed of without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2025 13:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694189" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 995 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429437</link>
      <description>The Madras HC ruled on a case involving provisional attachment of a bank account under Section 83 of CGST Act. The court found the attachment order expired after one year from its original date, rendering the writ petition infructuous. Consequently, the petitioner was permitted to resume normal bank account operations without restrictions, and the case was disposed of without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429437</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>