<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 984 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429426</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the lower authorities&#039; decision to add Rs. 5,38,00,000 under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act due to unexplained cash credit. The Tribunal found that the assessee had provided sufficient evidence, including the source of investments, and criticized the AO for not summoning directors of investor companies. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of cross-examination and ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the deletion of the addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2022 14:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694178" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 984 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429426</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the lower authorities&#039; decision to add Rs. 5,38,00,000 under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act due to unexplained cash credit. The Tribunal found that the assessee had provided sufficient evidence, including the source of investments, and criticized the AO for not summoning directors of investor companies. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of cross-examination and ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the deletion of the addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429426</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>