<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 978 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429420</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, quashing the assessment reopening under section 147 due to mechanical approval without independent application of mind. Consequently, the addition under section 68 for unexplained cash deposits and penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) were invalidated. The decision highlighted the importance of assessing authorities applying independent and thoughtful consideration in reopening assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2022 09:16:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694172" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 978 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429420</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, quashing the assessment reopening under section 147 due to mechanical approval without independent application of mind. Consequently, the addition under section 68 for unexplained cash deposits and penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) were invalidated. The decision highlighted the importance of assessing authorities applying independent and thoughtful consideration in reopening assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429420</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>