<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 957 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429399</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals by setting aside the demand for Cenvat credit recovery for processed goods cleared on payment of duty and remanding the matter for detailed calculation and restoration of the reversed credit. The penalty on the Executive Director was upheld, while the demand for Cenvat credit recovery and associated penalty on the appellant were set aside. The original authority was directed to decide the matter within three months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2022 09:14:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694151" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 957 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429399</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals by setting aside the demand for Cenvat credit recovery for processed goods cleared on payment of duty and remanding the matter for detailed calculation and restoration of the reversed credit. The penalty on the Executive Director was upheld, while the demand for Cenvat credit recovery and associated penalty on the appellant were set aside. The original authority was directed to decide the matter within three months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429399</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>